Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Michael had complete control over the couple’s finances. The couple did not have a joint bank account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136570 - 2015-03-09
, Michael had complete control over the couple’s finances. The couple did not have a joint bank account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136570 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the circuit court decision denying Guzman-Rosiles’s motion to dismiss, or to Guzman-Rosiles’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280679 - 2020-08-20
to a challenge to the circuit court decision denying Guzman-Rosiles’s motion to dismiss, or to Guzman-Rosiles’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280679 - 2020-08-20
[MS WORD]
FA-4128VA: Declaration to Show Cause and Request for Hearing for Temporary Order with Minor
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: 2 Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A
/formdisplay/FA-4128VA_es.doc?formNumber=FA-4128VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2025-08-12
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: 2 Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A
/formdisplay/FA-4128VA_es.doc?formNumber=FA-4128VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2025-08-12
State v. Daniel W. Harr
[the] entire structure of the sentence,” and stated that it would entertain “a motion in that regard.” Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
[the] entire structure of the sentence,” and stated that it would entertain “a motion in that regard.” Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
“consider modifying [the] entire structure of the sentence,” and stated that it would entertain “a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
“consider modifying [the] entire structure of the sentence,” and stated that it would entertain “a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven B. Post
of conviction and orders denying his postconviction motions. He raises numerous issues. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16145 - 2017-09-21
of conviction and orders denying his postconviction motions. He raises numerous issues. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16145 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven B. Post
CURIAM. Steven B. Post appeals a judgment of conviction and orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Steven B. Post appeals a judgment of conviction and orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
/a Cindy Hilsgen, appeals from an order denying her motion for relief from the property division
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
/a Cindy Hilsgen, appeals from an order denying her motion for relief from the property division
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
State v. Richard L. Verkler
to advise custodial defendants that the right to counsel does not apply to the implied consent setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
to advise custodial defendants that the right to counsel does not apply to the implied consent setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Verkler
held that law officers are under no affirmative duty to advise custodial defendants that the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5335 - 2017-09-19
held that law officers are under no affirmative duty to advise custodial defendants that the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5335 - 2017-09-19