Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 6253 for cf.

[PDF] State v. Todd W. Timblin
809.62. Appeal No. 02-0275-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-273 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4894 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Raymond L. Matzker
, 245-46 (Ct. App. 1983); cf. Schimmel v. State, 84 Wis.2d 287, 297-98, 267 N.W.2d 271, 276 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8366 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Avery L. Dallapiazza
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-3114 Cir. Ct. No. 98 CF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4615 - 2017-09-19

Town of Russell Volunteer Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
involved. Cf. id. (stating that even if cases have very similar facts, it does not necessarily mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13744 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harlan Schwartz
-CF-76 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4846 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and carry out the search warrant. Cf. Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 705 (1981) (“[A] warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
while armed could have supported a viable claim of self-defense to that charge. Cf. McMorris v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955313 - 2025-05-13

CA Blank Order
. Cf. id., ¶43 (explaining that read-in charges, but not dismissed charges, are “subject to restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132022 - 2014-12-17

State v. Bradley S. Whitman
. Appeal No. 02-0694-CR Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-10 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5033 - 2005-03-31

WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1528 Complete Title of...
to satisfy the judgment; as such, this order does not present a question for review. Cf. Lassa v. Rongstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96965 - 2013-06-25