Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 29926 for des.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 29926 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is a question of law that we consider de novo. Hofflander v. St. Catherine’s Hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
judgment decision is a question of law that we consider de novo. Hofflander v. St. Catherine’s Hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
809.18 (2001-02). 1 We affirm. ¶2 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7217 - 2017-09-20
809.18 (2001-02). 1 We affirm. ¶2 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7217 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 101
and contract interpretation. We apply de novo review to these questions of law. Steinmann v. Steinmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21
and contract interpretation. We apply de novo review to these questions of law. Steinmann v. Steinmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Plover v. Dorothea W. Binagi
. Therefore, we review de novo whether the trial court erred in applying the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20564 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, we review de novo whether the trial court erred in applying the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20564 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. Walford
. § 343.305(4) and the analysis of Walford’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
. § 343.305(4) and the analysis of Walford’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13888 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Monroe v. Justin P. Foulker
it de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis. 2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16134 - 2017-09-21
it de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis. 2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16134 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles A. Toal
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Id., ¶17. We first clarify two factual points. Meza asserts in his brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
that we review de novo. Id., ¶17. We first clarify two factual points. Meza asserts in his brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05