Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 4241 - 4250 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Roger P. Barber
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven C. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
, 677 N.W.2d 233. Tietsworth contends first, that the trial court erred in concluding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20569 - 2017-09-21
, 677 N.W.2d 233. Tietsworth contends first, that the trial court erred in concluding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
of an intoxicant (OWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant (OWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Peter Ikeler
2 his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20797 - 2017-09-21
2 his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20797 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
contained the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
contained the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
State v. Douglas Peter Ikeler
denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
trusses fell on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
trusses fell on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
Rohini Avvaru v. Gerald D. O'Marro
. Gerald D. O’Marro. They claim that the trial court erred in not granting them default judgment against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11023 - 2005-03-31
. Gerald D. O’Marro. They claim that the trial court erred in not granting them default judgment against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James D. Curtis
his NO. 96-1987-CR 2 postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
his NO. 96-1987-CR 2 postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19