Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42401 - 42410 of 98491 for court records search online.
Search results 42401 - 42410 of 98491 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Walter Smith
COURT COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN Opinion Released: June 25, 1996 Opinion Filed: June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8406 - 2017-09-19
COURT COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN Opinion Released: June 25, 1996 Opinion Filed: June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8406 - 2017-09-19
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when Kamilla’s trial counsel indicated that a psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when Kamilla’s trial counsel indicated that a psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when Kamilla’s trial counsel indicated that a psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31
it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when Kamilla’s trial counsel indicated that a psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
of Hertel and/or Ashley and then withdrew it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7245 - 2017-09-20
of Hertel and/or Ashley and then withdrew it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7245 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
of Hertel and/or Ashley and then withdrew it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20
of Hertel and/or Ashley and then withdrew it on the record before the court on June 20, 2003, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 79
)] ground? [ALEXIS]: Yes, I do. THE COURT: That finding would remain as part of the record. Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96471 - 2014-09-15
)] ground? [ALEXIS]: Yes, I do. THE COURT: That finding would remain as part of the record. Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the sentence, the record reveals that the sentencing court’s discretionary decision had a “rational
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251862 - 2020-01-02
to the sentence, the record reveals that the sentencing court’s discretionary decision had a “rational
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251862 - 2020-01-02
State v. Michael Cruz
by the Escalona record, we will reach the merits of his § 974.06, Stats., motion. We agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
by the Escalona record, we will reach the merits of his § 974.06, Stats., motion. We agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Cruz
prompted to investigate whether Cruz understood the trial court proceedings. Based upon the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
prompted to investigate whether Cruz understood the trial court proceedings. Based upon the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
the State were not part of the record below, the trial court could not properly have reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6198 - 2005-03-31
the State were not part of the record below, the trial court could not properly have reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6198 - 2005-03-31