Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42461 - 42470 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] City of Monroe v. Steven L. Furgason
gathered by Augsburger to support probable cause for the arrest. Rather, he claims that the muffler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12281 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
hearing to address Steward’s claims that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98716 - 2013-06-26

Tecumseh Products Company v. American Employers Insurance Company
judgment claiming that the trial court’s previous decision that the release of PCBs into the environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11933 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with directions. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Robert Staeheli appeals a small claims judgment in favor of Curtis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61248 - 2011-03-14

State v. Timothy Zeilinger
to a reasonable suspicion. ¶8 In support of its claim that the trial court erred, the State compares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31

Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
following her divorce from Frederick W. Thomas in 1992. Vicki claims: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and a quantity of marijuana plants. Williams moved to suppress the evidence, claiming that the officers lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58770 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jimmie Baldwin
before trial stating particularly the place where the defendant claims to have been when the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
for five years. ¶5 Freeman filed a postconviction motion to withdraw her no-contest plea, claiming her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58829 - 2014-09-15

City of Monroe v. Steven L. Furgason
probable cause for the arrest. Rather, he claims that the muffler ordinance is unconstitutionally vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12282 - 2005-03-31