Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42461 - 42470 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 42461 - 42470 of 64077 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual basis for the plea, that the State had clearly stated the plea agreement on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94617 - 2014-09-15
factual basis for the plea, that the State had clearly stated the plea agreement on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and read in at sentencing. The record included convictions for resisting or obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25
and read in at sentencing. The record included convictions for resisting or obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
Jane A. Patrickus v. Robert Patrickus
conclude that the record supports the trial court’s determination that a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16329 - 2017-09-21
conclude that the record supports the trial court’s determination that a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 167
) (notice satisfied only when clerk mails and records the award) conflicted. Therefore, we explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
) (notice satisfied only when clerk mails and records the award) conflicted. Therefore, we explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and satisfaction does not apply under the undisputed facts of record; therefore Pekin had no obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27360 - 2014-09-15
and satisfaction does not apply under the undisputed facts of record; therefore Pekin had no obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27360 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
matter because the letter was a public record.[4] ¶11 Mrs. Moser initially told Attorney Kessler
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55543 - 2010-10-13
matter because the letter was a public record.[4] ¶11 Mrs. Moser initially told Attorney Kessler
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55543 - 2010-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the lab report recording the crime lab’s conclusions was admitted into evidence. ¶33 The surveillance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65045 - 2011-05-31
of the lab report recording the crime lab’s conclusions was admitted into evidence. ¶33 The surveillance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65045 - 2011-05-31
John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
, the record reveals that the chairman of the FPC declared, “[t]he Commission, regardless of its view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
, the record reveals that the chairman of the FPC declared, “[t]he Commission, regardless of its view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 250
, 734, 549 N.W.2d 769 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶7 Here, nothing in the record suggests the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
, 734, 549 N.W.2d 769 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶7 Here, nothing in the record suggests the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
2006 WI APP 261
or five times over the course of the day, sharing information, though it is not stated in the record what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27184 - 2006-12-19
or five times over the course of the day, sharing information, though it is not stated in the record what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27184 - 2006-12-19