Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42481 - 42490 of 68290 for did.
Search results 42481 - 42490 of 68290 for did.
State v. Sheldon R.
denying reconsideration of the original order.[2] We hold that the juvenile court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4412 - 2005-03-31
denying reconsideration of the original order.[2] We hold that the juvenile court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4412 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and that the court did not misadvise T.A.D.S. The postdisposition court noted that the circuit court specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242095 - 2019-06-18
), and that the court did not misadvise T.A.D.S. The postdisposition court noted that the circuit court specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242095 - 2019-06-18
State v. Stacy D. Davis
and abdomen, but did not make contact. She also claimed that Davis repeatedly kicked her while she was lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31
and abdomen, but did not make contact. She also claimed that Davis repeatedly kicked her while she was lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Kaufman
did not address this issue. Because we choose to decide the appeal on the merits, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
did not address this issue. Because we choose to decide the appeal on the merits, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered William jailed if he did not satisfy the purge conditions by November 9. He made no payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
ordered William jailed if he did not satisfy the purge conditions by November 9. He made no payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Baskerville failed to establish a new factor because Baskerville did not establish that the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
that Baskerville failed to establish a new factor because Baskerville did not establish that the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darrel W. Howsden
did the State discover that the witness had been present during Howsden's testimony. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9479 - 2005-03-31
did the State discover that the witness had been present during Howsden's testimony. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The second motion argued for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97549 - 2014-09-15
. The second motion argued for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97549 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
that the proffered evidence did not fall within one of the statutory exceptions. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
that the proffered evidence did not fall within one of the statutory exceptions. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.32. Ferguson did not respond. After independently reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102472 - 2013-09-25
. Stat. Rule 809.32. Ferguson did not respond. After independently reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102472 - 2013-09-25