Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42481 - 42490 of 58483 for speedy trial.

State v. Jerry M. McAnulty
gathered after the stop was admissible. After a trial on stipulated facts, the court found McAnulty guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective by not objecting to the court’s viewing and consideration of the video
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157543 - 2017-09-21

State v. Richard L. Borowitz
, and possessing it with intent to deliver. Borowitz entered a no contest plea to the charges after the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3686 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
are that Wodajo “was not any victim in any one of the alleged robberies” and that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131969 - 2014-12-16

Arcadia Financial, Ltd. v. Susannah Q. Carey
supports the trial court’s determination that Arcadia satisfied the prerequisites to the maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2102 - 2005-03-31

Kenneth Lindstrom v. Patriot Homes, Inc.
for the unpaid balance. At the jury trial, the court employed a special verdict form, consisting of multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20530 - 2005-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
represented by his attorney.” Based on Coleman’s statement, his trial counsel moved to withdraw. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001485 - 2025-08-27

[PDF] State v. Scott L. Zimmermann
pursuant to § 343.305(9)(a)5, STATS. He argues that before the trial court may find a refusal to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12156 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at sentencing; and (3) whether Greuel was afforded effective assistance of trial counsel. With respect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109564 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas G. Larson
conduct. Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5754 - 2005-03-31