Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4251 - 4260 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
Search results 4251 - 4260 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor, sentence modification was not warranted. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104027 - 2013-11-12
the existence of a new factor, sentence modification was not warranted. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104027 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to participate in the earned release program while in prison is a new factor that warrants relief. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
to participate in the earned release program while in prison is a new factor that warrants relief. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a new factor that warrants relief. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Victoria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100035 - 2017-09-21
is a new factor that warrants relief. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Victoria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100035 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shuron C. Davis
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his request for new counsel.[3] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his request for new counsel.[3] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith R. Randolph
§ 973.195 only insofar as he asserts that it constitutes a new factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7020 - 2017-09-20
§ 973.195 only insofar as he asserts that it constitutes a new factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7020 - 2017-09-20
State v. Keith R. Randolph
an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[1] He appears to contend that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[1] He appears to contend that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary D. Perry
that the trial court improperly declined to order a new trial based on the victim's recantation. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court improperly declined to order a new trial based on the victim's recantation. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing his claims against D & J Enterprises,[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing his claims against D & J Enterprises,[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wade C. Deveney
Deveney is entitled to credit against his escape sentence for time spent incarcerated in New Hampshire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13081 - 2017-09-21
Deveney is entitled to credit against his escape sentence for time spent incarcerated in New Hampshire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13081 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wade C. Deveney
) whether Deveney is entitled to credit against his escape sentence for time spent incarcerated in New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13081 - 2005-03-31
) whether Deveney is entitled to credit against his escape sentence for time spent incarcerated in New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13081 - 2005-03-31