Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4251 - 4260 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 4251 - 4260 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gregg R. Madden
pressured by his attorney to enter the pleas, he was innocent and he wished to go to trial. No. 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14093 - 2014-09-15
pressured by his attorney to enter the pleas, he was innocent and he wished to go to trial. No. 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14093 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34876 - 2008-12-16
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34876 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2002). In June of 2007, Townsend filed a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
, 2002). In June of 2007, Townsend filed a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Townsend filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07
, Townsend filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
of burglary and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
of burglary and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
was violated when he was prosecuted a second time after the State caused a mistrial in his first trial. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
was violated when he was prosecuted a second time after the State caused a mistrial in his first trial. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
for postconviction relief. He contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31