Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42501 - 42510 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 42501 - 42510 of 83395 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139603 - 2015-04-08
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139603 - 2015-04-08
CA Blank Order
the suppression motion. Ochoa then agreed to resolve his cases with a plea agreement. In exchange for his guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
the suppression motion. Ochoa then agreed to resolve his cases with a plea agreement. In exchange for his guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion in 2000 by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48903 - 2010-04-12
sentencing discretion in 2000 by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48903 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. John Battiste
to adequately investigate the case; (3) failing to disclose a conflict of interest; and (4) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13487 - 2017-09-21
to adequately investigate the case; (3) failing to disclose a conflict of interest; and (4) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
brought two additional cases against him, one in July and one in November 2007. All three cases grew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57112 - 2014-09-15
brought two additional cases against him, one in July and one in November 2007. All three cases grew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57112 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and has developed significant experience in deciding cases involving the issue of mandatory bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15
and has developed significant experience in deciding cases involving the issue of mandatory bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “in order to recover compensation in a case of occupational disease, there must be actual physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123115 - 2017-09-21
that “in order to recover compensation in a case of occupational disease, there must be actual physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123115 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At a January 2022 hearing, the circuit court granted Krekeler’s motion. The court reasoned that “the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652426 - 2023-05-04
At a January 2022 hearing, the circuit court granted Krekeler’s motion. The court reasoned that “the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652426 - 2023-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15