Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42511 - 42520 of 58507 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Ellen M. Wockenfus v. Randy L. Wockenfus
Wockenfus. Randy argues the trial court erred by (1) ordering him to attend a vocational assessment; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6821 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Brown County v. Paul S.K.
, “stupid, it’s for eat’n.” At the trial, the court heard testimony from John Ahern, a social worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12509 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
hearing in one and one-half years. Testimony was taken at the divorce trial about the settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62329 - 2011-04-05

CA Blank Order
, Chris has not provided a transcript of the divorce trial. In the absence of a trial transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113092 - 2014-05-22

Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
of the Hanson’s 200 acres from wooded pasture to woodland or forest. Because the trial court correctly concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25179 - 2006-05-15

American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Paula Edwards
, stating that it held the amount requested under the garnishment complaint. ¶5 A trial was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17857 - 2005-04-26

[PDF] County of Green Lake v. Donald L. Peters
’ motion. After a jury trial, Peters was found guilty on both counts. Peters appeals. Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14946 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of this appeal. ¶6 The construction of a will is a question of law we review without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35926 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
reconfinement was based upon inadequate sentencing information because the trial court failed to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29

State v. Henry James Brookshire
aggravating circumstances unless they were established beyond a reasonable doubt. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31