Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42511 - 42520 of 60453 for two.
Search results 42511 - 42520 of 60453 for two.
COURT OF APPEALS
. In determining whether an agreement is substantively fair, a court must be mindful of two legislative concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41947 - 2009-10-07
. In determining whether an agreement is substantively fair, a court must be mindful of two legislative concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41947 - 2009-10-07
State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
of conveying two meanings” and that “an ambiguity exists” in the use of the term “convicted” in § 939.62(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3333 - 2005-03-31
of conveying two meanings” and that “an ambiguity exists” in the use of the term “convicted” in § 939.62(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3333 - 2005-03-31
Patricia J. Tabbutt v. Robert Goree
by informing Goree that Goree would only have five minutes and could only call one or two witnesses. Goree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3831 - 2005-03-31
by informing Goree that Goree would only have five minutes and could only call one or two witnesses. Goree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“refused or neglected to take advantage of.” The court discussed two past occasions in which Slawson had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665919 - 2023-06-08
“refused or neglected to take advantage of.” The court discussed two past occasions in which Slawson had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665919 - 2023-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
by employing a two-part inquiry in which we uphold a trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138435 - 2015-03-31
by employing a two-part inquiry in which we uphold a trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138435 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1973). Rather, “[t]here are two situations where refusal to confirm is warranted. The first is where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56192 - 2010-11-01
(1973). Rather, “[t]here are two situations where refusal to confirm is warranted. The first is where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56192 - 2010-11-01
Burnett County Department of Human Services v. Tera L. R.
from the two comments quoted above, there was no other discussion on the record regarding scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20348 - 2005-11-21
from the two comments quoted above, there was no other discussion on the record regarding scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20348 - 2005-11-21
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
substantial argument on what might have been two intriguing questions: (1) Is the “reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5599 - 2017-09-19
substantial argument on what might have been two intriguing questions: (1) Is the “reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5599 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sean P. Tate
forty-four hours after his arrest. At his trial, the witnesses included two of his accomplices, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4296 - 2005-03-31
forty-four hours after his arrest. At his trial, the witnesses included two of his accomplices, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4296 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a reduced sentence of two years, six months’ initial confinement and six years, six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105988 - 2017-09-21
requested a reduced sentence of two years, six months’ initial confinement and six years, six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105988 - 2017-09-21

