Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42521 - 42530 of 83367 for case search.
Search results 42521 - 42530 of 83367 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then presented the testimony of M.S.H.’s case manager, C.B. Relevant to this appeal, C.B. testified that A.M.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526857 - 2022-06-01
then presented the testimony of M.S.H.’s case manager, C.B. Relevant to this appeal, C.B. testified that A.M.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526857 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
). In his case, we could relabel his petition as either a direct appeal or a postconviction motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
). In his case, we could relabel his petition as either a direct appeal or a postconviction motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
and have it delivered to Zink. Later on, Tesar heated up some of the crank in a light bulb casing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
and have it delivered to Zink. Later on, Tesar heated up some of the crank in a light bulb casing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misconduct; and (6) the prosecutor violated due process by requesting restitution for cases in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29986 - 2007-08-15
misconduct; and (6) the prosecutor violated due process by requesting restitution for cases in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29986 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641016 - 2023-04-05
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641016 - 2023-04-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The case went to trial on Hefter’s claims against Jane Ennis and Wayne Ennis. ¶4 At trial, Hefter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29258 - 2014-09-15
. The case went to trial on Hefter’s claims against Jane Ennis and Wayne Ennis. ¶4 At trial, Hefter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29258 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark H.K.
applicable to both this case and another. Mark appeals that portion of the order addressing his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
applicable to both this case and another. Mark appeals that portion of the order addressing his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
- CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I II
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78349 - 2013-02-11
- CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I II
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78349 - 2013-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, and imperative duty to act. Id., ¶34. ¶5 Citing several Wisconsin cases where the exception was applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103011 - 2013-10-14
, and imperative duty to act. Id., ¶34. ¶5 Citing several Wisconsin cases where the exception was applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103011 - 2013-10-14