Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42541 - 42550 of 68290 for did.

[PDF] Thomas L. Anderson v. State of Wisconsin Parole Commission
to participate in counseling or treatment .…” The court determined, as a matter of law, that Anderson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7294 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, with respect to the jury instructions/verdicts, the jury did have lesser included offenses to consider in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705850 - 2023-09-27

COURT OF APPEALS
to the officer as gray or green. ¶4 In responding to the call, the officer did not look at the computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25

Leonard L. Jones v. State
examination of the arresting officer: THE DEFENDANT: Did you feel you had any probable cause to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31

Scott A. Jagodzinski v. Tom Jessup
conclude that the trial court erred by determining the code did not apply, and remand this matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12231 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
). The trial court did not, however. Rather, it determined that if Fisher wanted to use Slocum to undermine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56419 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Moreover, Jackson clarified to the circuit court that he did not admit to the read-in charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218909 - 2018-09-11

[PDF] Brown County Dept. of Human Services v. Laurie and Loonie M.
failed to follow statutorily required procedures and that they did not understand the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24734 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Raymond C. Williams
. On appeal, Williams argues that the trial court did not individually consider and rule upon each item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12168 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Melvin Caballero
that Caballero did not meet the Strickland test, and denied his motion without a Machner hearing. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9337 - 2017-09-19