Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 57346 for id.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 57346 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Andrew S. Miller
that is lawful under the Speedy Trial Act generally will comply with the mandate of the Detainer Act.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
that is lawful under the Speedy Trial Act generally will comply with the mandate of the Detainer Act.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
At a refusal hearing, the court is not to weigh the competing evidence when determining probable cause. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
At a refusal hearing, the court is not to weigh the competing evidence when determining probable cause. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
Adam G. Hinton v. Allstate Insurance Company
, the error affected a substantial right, and the error probably affected the result of the trial. Id. at 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14456 - 2005-03-31
, the error affected a substantial right, and the error probably affected the result of the trial. Id. at 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law. Id. If the No. 2022AP825-CR 6 circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839619 - 2024-08-20
of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law. Id. If the No. 2022AP825-CR 6 circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839619 - 2024-08-20
State v. Carolyn G.
did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Id. ¶11 Jesse argues that his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2007-03-28
did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Id. ¶11 Jesse argues that his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2007-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a proper exercise of discretion. See id., ¶38. Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
for a proper exercise of discretion. See id., ¶38. Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
before giving a statement. See id., 384 U.S. at 444; State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 714-15, 345 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
before giving a statement. See id., 384 U.S. at 444; State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 714-15, 345 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
CA Blank Order
serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.” Id. We determine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.” Id. We determine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
Richard D. Winters, Jr. v. Marianne Cooke
before the committee. Id. We determine: (1) whether the committee stayed within its jurisdiction; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
before the committee. Id. We determine: (1) whether the committee stayed within its jurisdiction; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance,” see id., 466 U.S. at 690, and to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78581 - 2012-03-07
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance,” see id., 466 U.S. at 690, and to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78581 - 2012-03-07