Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 75271 for public records.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 75271 for public records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
instruction that addresses when a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60902 - 2014-09-15
instruction that addresses when a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60902 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to him. Based upon this court’s review of the parties’ arguments and the record, and for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833690 - 2024-08-07
to him. Based upon this court’s review of the parties’ arguments and the record, and for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833690 - 2024-08-07
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. . Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. . Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording is not produced at trial. ¶3 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60902 - 2011-03-15
a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording is not produced at trial. ¶3 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60902 - 2011-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
error, and the circuit court failed to properly exercise its discretion on the record regarding its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
error, and the circuit court failed to properly exercise its discretion on the record regarding its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
. STAT. § 814.025. Because the record supports the trial court’s decision, we affirm the order. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 814.025. Because the record supports the trial court’s decision, we affirm the order. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
State v. William H. Roberts
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court failed to conduct an on- the-record colloquy). ¶2 As I explain, the State in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
the circuit court failed to conduct an on- the-record colloquy). ¶2 As I explain, the State in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89261 - 2014-09-15
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89261 - 2014-09-15