Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 74814 for public records.
Search results 42551 - 42560 of 74814 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as “Payback,” the detective consulted the Kenosha police department records under the name “Payback” and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
as “Payback,” the detective consulted the Kenosha police department records under the name “Payback” and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has not done so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637987 - 2023-03-30
right to file a response, and has not done so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637987 - 2023-03-30
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
additional explanation for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6602 - 2017-09-19
additional explanation for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6602 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appendix, filing a false appendix certification, citing to its appendix rather than the record, and filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32150 - 2008-03-17
appendix, filing a false appendix certification, citing to its appendix rather than the record, and filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32150 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
1 The record indicates that Pesek was represented by legal counsel before the agency. 2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13456 - 2017-09-21
1 The record indicates that Pesek was represented by legal counsel before the agency. 2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13456 - 2017-09-21
Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
opinion in the record. The Department did not present any medical evidence to the contrary. The courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13456 - 2005-03-31
opinion in the record. The Department did not present any medical evidence to the contrary. The courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this No. 2019AP834
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314288 - 2020-12-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this No. 2019AP834
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314288 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Kevin J. Pierce
to participate in the no merit procedure. Based upon our independent review of the entire record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10056 - 2017-09-19
to participate in the no merit procedure. Based upon our independent review of the entire record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10056 - 2017-09-19