Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42591 - 42600 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] BE-001 Sample application
claim citizenship and describe your immigration status. 7. Have you ever served in the Armed Forces
/services/attorney/docs/sampleadmissapp2026.pdf - 2025-09-30

COURT OF APPEALS
is that a guilty plea “waives all nonjurisdictional defects, including constitutional claims.” State v. Kelty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90205 - 2012-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
claim that trial counsel was ineffective for stipulating to a legally problematic restitution amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827235 - 2024-07-17

COURT OF APPEALS
whether she could pursue a double damages claim under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(1)(b), because the Kistners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28

COURT OF APPEALS
that Smith now claimed was “newly discovered” was contained in police reports available to Smith before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41513 - 2009-09-28

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
of which terminated her parental rights to one of her four children. She claims the verdicts, on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15826 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
of which terminated her parental rights to one of her four children. She claims the verdicts, on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15827 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
citation that the State provides does not support that claim. Instead, notes Taff, the record is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079524 - 2026-02-17

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
claims the verdicts, on which the termination orders were based, are defective because the same five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15827 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Douglas J. Lasky
is asserting a “simple claim of statutory error” under WIS. STAT. § 939.71, rather than a constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4387 - 2017-09-19