Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42591 - 42600 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 42591 - 42600 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
possession claim that was not before the trial court on a motion. The Stupars own Lot 16 in the Baskins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9471 - 2017-09-19
possession claim that was not before the trial court on a motion. The Stupars own Lot 16 in the Baskins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9471 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with it. ¶4 After trial to the court, the circuit court awarded compensatory and exemplary damages, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
with it. ¶4 After trial to the court, the circuit court awarded compensatory and exemplary damages, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial and from an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Heroux challenges the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
trial and from an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Heroux challenges the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not set a date for sentencing, because Fitzgerald could not be sentenced until after Meeks’ trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236018 - 2019-02-26
not set a date for sentencing, because Fitzgerald could not be sentenced until after Meeks’ trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236018 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in favor of Mollica. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the small claims trial, the following facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118465 - 2014-09-15
in favor of Mollica. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the small claims trial, the following facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118465 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the rule was disputed and a matter for trial, and it denied Hidden Ridge’s motion. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34316 - 2008-10-14
violated the rule was disputed and a matter for trial, and it denied Hidden Ridge’s motion. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34316 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, it is the equivalent of a stipulation of facts permitting the trial court to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment, it is the equivalent of a stipulation of facts permitting the trial court to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
recanting the sexual assault allegations. At trial, McNamara testified that, consistent with Lewallen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30142 - 2014-09-15
recanting the sexual assault allegations. At trial, McNamara testified that, consistent with Lewallen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and would have insisted on going to trial.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 312, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46617 - 2014-09-15
and would have insisted on going to trial.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 312, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” But, as noted, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29037 - 2014-09-15
to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” But, as noted, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29037 - 2014-09-15