Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
finalizing his divorce from Jamie Mamerow. Brian also appeals an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641710 - 2023-04-06
finalizing his divorce from Jamie Mamerow. Brian also appeals an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641710 - 2023-04-06
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
He contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the charges on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
Brown County v. Shannon R.
, constitutionally protected liberty interest in the "companionship, care, custody, and management" of their children
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
, constitutionally protected liberty interest in the "companionship, care, custody, and management" of their children
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
State v. Keith A. Rudolph
summarily denying his motion for resentencing.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
summarily denying his motion for resentencing.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-sentencing motion for plea withdrawal must establish that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
-sentencing motion for plea withdrawal must establish that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, 2011. Upon the commission’s motion, the circuit court dismissed the complaint as untimely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101973 - 2013-09-11
, 2011. Upon the commission’s motion, the circuit court dismissed the complaint as untimely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101973 - 2013-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the commission’s motion, the circuit court dismissed the complaint as untimely and this appeal follows. Where
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101973 - 2017-09-21
the commission’s motion, the circuit court dismissed the complaint as untimely and this appeal follows. Where
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Rudolph
child support, and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for resentencing. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25673 - 2017-09-21
child support, and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for resentencing. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25673 - 2017-09-21