Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 82610 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
based on those facts would be permissible under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 328.22(3) and applicable case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338362 - 2021-02-24

[PDF] Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
2000 WI App 61 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1082-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15428 - 2017-09-21

Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1082-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
confinement. He claims: (1) the Secretary violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.85(2) (Dec. 2006),2 and thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35114 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
administrative confinement. He claims: (1) the Secretary violated Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.85(2) (Dec. 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35114 - 2009-01-07

Daniel T. Mayer v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
authority to determine trustee breaches of obligation is necessarily implied. Our resolution of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3215 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Daniel T. Mayer v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
of this case does not require us to address the cross-appeal. We reverse the judgment of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3215 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the record.... Based on the nature and severity of the case, the senseless taking of a life[,] it’s clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196844 - 2017-09-26

David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
, the court subtracted $1000 for some Deletron pulsation units, and $1,500 for a Pipeline milking system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
paid for it, and that there was a question as to who owned it. Next, the court subtracted $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15026 - 2017-09-21