Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 29942 for des.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 29942 for des.
Stansfield Vending, Inc. v. Osseo Truck Travel Plaza, LLC
issues remain and our review is de novo.” Kernz v. J.L. French Corp., No. 02-1292, ¶29 (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6401 - 2005-03-31
issues remain and our review is de novo.” Kernz v. J.L. French Corp., No. 02-1292, ¶29 (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6401 - 2005-03-31
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
Donna Martinez v. Waukesha County
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18106 - 2005-05-11
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18106 - 2005-05-11
State v. Charles A. Toal
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
Ronald DeLong v. Kenneth Hess
have influenced the circuit court’s decision. However, because we review summary judgments de novo, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4541 - 2005-03-31
have influenced the circuit court’s decision. However, because we review summary judgments de novo, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review issues of law de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63427 - 2011-05-02
). We review issues of law de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63427 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is a question of law that we consider de novo. Hofflander v. St. Catherine’s Hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
judgment decision is a question of law that we consider de novo. Hofflander v. St. Catherine’s Hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. Dan A. Buchler
committee is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7955 - 2005-03-31
committee is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7955 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
Gary K. Augustine v. Douglas Makos
was validly entered into is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 264, 528 N.W.2d at 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9983 - 2005-03-31
was validly entered into is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 264, 528 N.W.2d at 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9983 - 2005-03-31