Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 29928 for des.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 29928 for des.
CA Blank Order
application of those facts to the law is reviewed de novo. Id. As a matter of law, violations of conditions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12
application of those facts to the law is reviewed de novo. Id. As a matter of law, violations of conditions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to be heard presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Vanmanivong, 2003 WI 41, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
to be heard presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Vanmanivong, 2003 WI 41, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a matter of law we review de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109909 - 2017-09-21
, a matter of law we review de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109909 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Iowa v. Leon T. Klinger
we review de novo. State v. Holmes, 106 Wis. 2d 31, 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d 703, 708 n.7 (1982). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5047 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. State v. Holmes, 106 Wis. 2d 31, 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d 703, 708 n.7 (1982). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5047 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eric J. Ball
. § 343.305(2) and the analysis of Ball’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5790 - 2005-03-31
. § 343.305(2) and the analysis of Ball’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5790 - 2005-03-31
State v. Irvin Stanley
of law subject to de novo review by this court. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9452 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to de novo review by this court. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9452 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian J. Buffum
the constitutional standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11548 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11548 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jorel T. Norwood
County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
and brackets omitted). We review a postconviction motion alleging a Bangert violation de novo. ¶3 Lewis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14
and brackets omitted). We review a postconviction motion alleging a Bangert violation de novo. ¶3 Lewis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14