Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 58479 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
. Ernest W. (L.C. 2013TP161) Before Curley, P.J.[1] Ernest W. appeals from a trial court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141951 - 2015-05-13
. Ernest W. (L.C. 2013TP161) Before Curley, P.J.[1] Ernest W. appeals from a trial court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141951 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
was violated when he was prosecuted a second time after the State caused a mistrial in his first trial. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
was violated when he was prosecuted a second time after the State caused a mistrial in his first trial. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, Townsend filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07
, Townsend filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
State v. Martin J. Applebee
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3349 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
for postconviction relief. He contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did not consult an expert on alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3473 - 2017-09-20
was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did not consult an expert on alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3473 - 2017-09-20
State v. James D. Miller
, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. The trial court granted a new trial to psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01
, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. The trial court granted a new trial to psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01