Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 4261 - 4270 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of burglary and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
of burglary and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
costs all resulted from the trial court’s erroneous exercise of discretion.1 Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12399 - 2017-09-21
costs all resulted from the trial court’s erroneous exercise of discretion.1 Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33536 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Ernest W. (L.C. 2013TP161) Before Curley, P.J.[1] Ernest W. appeals from a trial court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141951 - 2015-05-13
. Ernest W. (L.C. 2013TP161) Before Curley, P.J.[1] Ernest W. appeals from a trial court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141951 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
trial. See U.S. CONST. amend. V; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 8(1). Boyd also argues that he was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
trusses fell on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
trusses fell on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
contained the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
contained the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
State v. Douglas Peter Ikeler
denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Peter Ikeler
2 his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20797 - 2017-09-21
2 his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20797 - 2017-09-21