Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42611 - 42620 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 42611 - 42620 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Tammy F.
claim. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See Barthel v. Plath, 161 Wis.2d 587, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
claim. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See Barthel v. Plath, 161 Wis.2d 587, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
State v. Erin K.S.
] waiving juvenile jurisdiction over her. Erin claims that the juvenile court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5107 - 2005-03-31
] waiving juvenile jurisdiction over her. Erin claims that the juvenile court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying postconviction relief. Duke claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
and an order denying postconviction relief. Duke claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Yeng Vang
to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). This claim presents a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). This claim presents a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tammy F.
it quashed her discovery demand. Next, we address Tammy's due process claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
it quashed her discovery demand. Next, we address Tammy's due process claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
State v. Emmett J. Wimmer
of the injuries he had sustained. To support his argument, Wimmer relies on Mincey, claiming that the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5762 - 2005-03-31
of the injuries he had sustained. To support his argument, Wimmer relies on Mincey, claiming that the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5762 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with directions. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Zachary J. S. claims that he was in custody when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
with directions. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Zachary J. S. claims that he was in custody when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
residence on family farm land in an exclusive agricultural district. He claimed the residence would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09
residence on family farm land in an exclusive agricultural district. He claimed the residence would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09
Jeffrey P. Cheney v. Wilfred E. Morrow
countered, claiming he was or was supposed to be the recipient of a purchase money mortgage, creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5935 - 2005-03-31
countered, claiming he was or was supposed to be the recipient of a purchase money mortgage, creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5935 - 2005-03-31