Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42611 - 42620 of 83915 for case number.
Search results 42611 - 42620 of 83915 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
for the action. On October 26, 1998, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15197 - 2017-09-21
for the action. On October 26, 1998, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15197 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
State v. Pastori M. Balele
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
fifth offense or subsequent in Winnebago County case No. 04CF391. That occurred on September 3rd, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
fifth offense or subsequent in Winnebago County case No. 04CF391. That occurred on September 3rd, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The details of the sexual assault charge in this case are not relevant to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343952 - 2021-03-09
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The details of the sexual assault charge in this case are not relevant to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343952 - 2021-03-09
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09