Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42611 - 42620 of 69761 for hi.

Patricia L. Spencer v. Society Insurance
that Spencer had complained frequently about her neck. Anderson testified at his deposition that Spencer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2466 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Goldsworthy contends that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815924 - 2024-06-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶8 Under the criminal theft by bailee statute, a person is guilty of theft if: [b]y virtue of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116172 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, a person is guilty of theft if: [b]y virtue of his or her office, business or employment, or as trustee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116172 - 2014-07-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of eight crimes. His appellate counsel, Attorney Jill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772323 - 2024-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they were looking for was a friend of his mother’s, and the friend was in one of the bedrooms. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218216 - 2018-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
grant of summary judgment because it improperly determined his response to the State’s summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93964 - 2013-03-11

State v. Earl Steele III
] and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pea. He asserts that, due to an inadequate plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carl R. Nantelle
appeals his judgment of conviction for felony possession of tetrahydrocannibinol as a repeat drug offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15889 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gail Zimbrick v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
proceeding and to afford the person an opportunity to object and defend his or her rights. See Schramek v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15764 - 2017-09-21