Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42621 - 42630 of 83915 for case number.
Search results 42621 - 42630 of 83915 for case number.
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
District (the District). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91014 - 2013-01-02
District (the District). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91014 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Jay B. Stephany
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas W. Wood
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Christopher Beaman v. Bruce Fischer
of the plaintiff’s case, Fischer’s counsel moved for dismissal, arguing that Beaman had failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14620 - 2017-09-21
of the plaintiff’s case, Fischer’s counsel moved for dismissal, arguing that Beaman had failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14620 - 2017-09-21