Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42631 - 42640 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
Search results 42631 - 42640 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
Linda LaBerge v. Arthur LaBerge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: PATRICIA S. CURLEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9851 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: PATRICIA S. CURLEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9851 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Guman points to Debra A.E.’s declarations that “[d]efendants who are incompetent at the time they seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
Guman points to Debra A.E.’s declarations that “[d]efendants who are incompetent at the time they seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
that prevented compliance with the statute. See County of Milwaukee v. Edward S., 2001 WI App 169, ¶¶7-9, 247
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
that prevented compliance with the statute. See County of Milwaukee v. Edward S., 2001 WI App 169, ¶¶7-9, 247
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
service. The statute, however, mandated service of the raze order on the owner[s]. This court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43612 - 2014-09-15
service. The statute, however, mandated service of the raze order on the owner[s]. This court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43612 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
% 57% 60% 70% 58% Criminal 181 117 104 80 482 Percentage 52% 43% 40% 30% 42% %s
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78349 - 2013-02-11
% 57% 60% 70% 58% Criminal 181 117 104 80 482 Percentage 52% 43% 40% 30% 42% %s
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78349 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 766 N.W.2d 559. Because the DOC is merely “an arm of the [S]tate,” see Mayhugh v. State, 2015 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191056 - 2017-09-21
, 766 N.W.2d 559. Because the DOC is merely “an arm of the [S]tate,” see Mayhugh v. State, 2015 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
termination situations. See § 108.04(7)(am)-(s). The commission concluded that none of these exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28347 - 2014-09-15
termination situations. See § 108.04(7)(am)-(s). The commission concluded that none of these exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.... If a rehearing is requested under [WIS. STAT.] s. 227.49, any party desiring judicial review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88997 - 2014-09-15
.... If a rehearing is requested under [WIS. STAT.] s. 227.49, any party desiring judicial review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88997 - 2014-09-15
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2004
37% 35% 32% 31% 33% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 79% 16% 6% 69% 23% 8% 70
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29 - 2005-03-31
37% 35% 32% 31% 33% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 79% 16% 6% 69% 23% 8% 70
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29 - 2005-03-31
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Tawanna W.
questions of law that are reviewed de novo. Door County DHFS v. Scott S., 230 Wis. 2d 460, 465, 602 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7468 - 2005-03-31
questions of law that are reviewed de novo. Door County DHFS v. Scott S., 230 Wis. 2d 460, 465, 602 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7468 - 2005-03-31