Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42651 - 42660 of 82757 for case codes/1000.
Search results 42651 - 42660 of 82757 for case codes/1000.
John Erickson v. City of Janesville
the City of Janesville, Frank Silha, and Frank Silha & Sons, Inc., a construction company. The case arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8644 - 2005-03-31
the City of Janesville, Frank Silha, and Frank Silha & Sons, Inc., a construction company. The case arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
the same underlying events, they are significantly different. She maintains that “the first case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
the same underlying events, they are significantly different. She maintains that “the first case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review.”). ¶12 In this case, the trial court found Jacob dangerous under “the E Standard” (or fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922351 - 2025-03-05
review.”). ¶12 In this case, the trial court found Jacob dangerous under “the E Standard” (or fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922351 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
State v. John Yang
was liable for hate crime penalty enhancement. Discussion ¶5 The resolution of this case starts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
was liable for hate crime penalty enhancement. Discussion ¶5 The resolution of this case starts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James S. Riedel
2003 WI App 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1772-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1772-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on a case-by-case basis, under a totality of the circumstances analysis. Id., ¶20. This analysis includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
on a case-by-case basis, under a totality of the circumstances analysis. Id., ¶20. This analysis includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, case worker Sue Dervetski testified about a visit that occurred at Scott and Amanda’s house in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
, case worker Sue Dervetski testified about a visit that occurred at Scott and Amanda’s house in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
State v. Terry L. Schroedl
This case involves Schroedl’s relationship with two minor girls, both named Ashley. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3983 - 2005-03-31
This case involves Schroedl’s relationship with two minor girls, both named Ashley. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, and dismissed the three cases in this consolidated appeal.2 ¶2 The Town appeals, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
motion, and dismissed the three cases in this consolidated appeal.2 ¶2 The Town appeals, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
State v. Anthony Mark Caravella
of the case, why the particular component parts of the sentence imposed advance the specified objectives.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24944 - 2006-05-01
of the case, why the particular component parts of the sentence imposed advance the specified objectives.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24944 - 2006-05-01