Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42661 - 42670 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.

COURT OF APPEALS
claims the State did not prove that the specimen collection complied with Wis. Stat. § 343.305(5)(b).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32451 - 2008-04-15

wi app 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP511 Complete Title of ...
”) to the City.[1] The Sanitary District makes two claims, which it contends renders the annexation ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35971 - 2009-03-30

Byron Des Jarlais v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
was September 30, 1989. ¶4 Following his injury, Coutts filed a claim for permanent partial disability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17049 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
. As we have previously stated in accord with Strickland, "[i]n order to prove a claim of ineffective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17591 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 63
to adjudicate the claims, and therefore, the judgment was void. Id. ¶18 The Supreme Court agreed
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37055 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Roger S. Walker
. ¶6 Walker appealed the Resentence directly to the court of appeals, claiming the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25753 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dane County v. James S.
for termination are found by the court or a jury “the court shall find the parent unfit,” he claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. McArthur claimed that he shot M.M. accidentally. During the course of their relationship, McArthur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208612 - 2018-02-20

Timothy S. v. Lisa S.
Scott’s results were not certified.[4] Under those circumstances, he claims, the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18253 - 2005-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
and the record. The record allows the court to meaningfully address the defendant’s claim of prejudice. Dillard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141858 - 2015-05-18