Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42691 - 42700 of 64132 for records.
Search results 42691 - 42700 of 64132 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Knutson
is appealing from a “final judgment and sentence” in this driving-while-intoxicated case. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15531 - 2017-09-21
is appealing from a “final judgment and sentence” in this driving-while-intoxicated case. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15531 - 2017-09-21
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
For Public Hearing: Hearing Date/Time: 06-01 In re amendment of SCR 72.01 regarding record retention, filed
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21198 - 2006-01-30
For Public Hearing: Hearing Date/Time: 06-01 In re amendment of SCR 72.01 regarding record retention, filed
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21198 - 2006-01-30
February 1, 2000
and 805.07 (Electronic Discovery) 04/23/2009 09-02 In re amendment of SCR 72.01 regarding record retention 04
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36408 - 2009-05-03
and 805.07 (Electronic Discovery) 04/23/2009 09-02 In re amendment of SCR 72.01 regarding record retention 04
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36408 - 2009-05-03
State v. James E. Jones
of the sentence based on the trial court's erroneous exercise of discretion, and nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11206 - 2005-03-31
of the sentence based on the trial court's erroneous exercise of discretion, and nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11206 - 2005-03-31
Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
of review question noted above. ¶3 At oral argument, counsel acknowledged that the record contains
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16345 - 2005-03-31
of review question noted above. ¶3 At oral argument, counsel acknowledged that the record contains
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208068 - 2018-02-02
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208068 - 2018-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016859 - 2025-10-02
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016859 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64239 - 2014-09-15
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64239 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113009 - 2014-05-29
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113009 - 2014-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
in a settlement or plea agreement. As far as I can tell from the City’s responsive brief and the record, neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136549 - 2015-03-04
in a settlement or plea agreement. As far as I can tell from the City’s responsive brief and the record, neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136549 - 2015-03-04