Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 6253 for cf.
State v. Charles J. Burroughs
of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0738-CR Cir. Ct. No. 96-CF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0738-CR Cir. Ct. No. 96-CF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl H. Wainwright, Jr.
members because bias may be implied when a person is related to a party. Cf. State v. Gesch, 167 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15209 - 2005-03-31
members because bias may be implied when a person is related to a party. Cf. State v. Gesch, 167 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, there is simply no evidence in the record that any of the uncalled witnesses had this information. Cf. id. (“We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87170 - 2014-09-15
, there is simply no evidence in the record that any of the uncalled witnesses had this information. Cf. id. (“We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87170 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no legal authority to support it. Cf. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646-47, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
no legal authority to support it. Cf. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646-47, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
CA Blank Order
. Cf. id., ¶43 (explaining that read-in charges, but not dismissed charges, are “subject to restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132022 - 2014-12-17
. Cf. id., ¶43 (explaining that read-in charges, but not dismissed charges, are “subject to restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132022 - 2014-12-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
on this issue, he will not be heard to complain that the reduction is not sufficient. Cf. State v. Haynes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
on this issue, he will not be heard to complain that the reduction is not sufficient. Cf. State v. Haynes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard G. White
“irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution”); cf. State v. DeLao, 2002 WI 49, ¶21, 252
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6424 - 2017-09-19
“irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution”); cf. State v. DeLao, 2002 WI 49, ¶21, 252
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6424 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Alicea
prejudicial to the State because, as we have seen, the State had no right to that evidence. Cf. id., 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19
prejudicial to the State because, as we have seen, the State had no right to that evidence. Cf. id., 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
than plead guilty. Cf. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶¶9, 23. He did not do so. In this court, Triplett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252535 - 2020-01-14
than plead guilty. Cf. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶¶9, 23. He did not do so. In this court, Triplett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252535 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and does not determine whether a covered risk is independent from an excluded risk. Cf. [Lawver v. Boling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212854 - 2018-05-16
and does not determine whether a covered risk is independent from an excluded risk. Cf. [Lawver v. Boling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212854 - 2018-05-16