Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 29756 for des.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 29756 for des.
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
of his suppression issue de novo, as a matter of law. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, 195, 243 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
of his suppression issue de novo, as a matter of law. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, 195, 243 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
County of Dane v. Gary M. Sam
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11255 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donna Martinez v. Waukesha County
of the county on the grounds of governmental immunity. ¶3 We review a decision granting summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18106 - 2017-09-21
of the county on the grounds of governmental immunity. ¶3 We review a decision granting summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18106 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35194 - 2009-01-14
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35194 - 2009-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consider de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36, 319 Wis. 2d 1, 768
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896225 - 2025-01-02
consider de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36, 319 Wis. 2d 1, 768
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896225 - 2025-01-02
State v. Nancy R. Lamon
, and that our standard of review is de novo. See State v. Foster, 191 Wis. 2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
, and that our standard of review is de novo. See State v. Foster, 191 Wis. 2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
those alleged errors. We review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
those alleged errors. We review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
Daniel V. v. Debie M.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark E. Hanson
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03