Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 20874 for word.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 20874 for word.
State v. John W. Moore
and obscene, the profane, and libelous, and the insulting or “fighting words”—those which by their very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
and obscene, the profane, and libelous, and the insulting or “fighting words”—those which by their very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶6 Yellow Thunder argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶6 Yellow Thunder argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. The crucial word in § 77.54(6)(b), is “merchandise.” “Merchandise” is not defined in the statutes, but we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
. The crucial word in § 77.54(6)(b), is “merchandise.” “Merchandise” is not defined in the statutes, but we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to recall the words used during the discussions, the attorney testified that “I know we discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
to recall the words used during the discussions, the attorney testified that “I know we discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 57
].” Id., ¶32. In other words, Brown appears to acknowledge that while Truth-in-Sentencing changed who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
].” Id., ¶32. In other words, Brown appears to acknowledge that while Truth-in-Sentencing changed who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
2010 WI APP 32
that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45727 - 2010-02-23
that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45727 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Gregory A. Miller
. The court explained that “[t]he words ‘serious bodily injury’ are words of ordinary significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11991 - 2017-09-21
. The court explained that “[t]he words ‘serious bodily injury’ are words of ordinary significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11991 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
initial statement, indicating that she did not remember using the words “during the robbery” when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
initial statement, indicating that she did not remember using the words “during the robbery” when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
[PDF]
Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
language itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
language itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
21, 2007, Schuster-Kartes, in the words of the small claims court, filed “another whole lawsuit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22
21, 2007, Schuster-Kartes, in the words of the small claims court, filed “another whole lawsuit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22