Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42711 - 42720 of 68517 for did.
Search results 42711 - 42720 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
State v. James Durrah
.” At the postconviction motion hearing, Durrah did not seek to withdraw his pleas; rather, he sought only a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2236 - 2017-09-19
.” At the postconviction motion hearing, Durrah did not seek to withdraw his pleas; rather, he sought only a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2236 - 2017-09-19
Anjani K. Mehra v. Bay Watch Condominium Association
that Mehra did not rely on any misrepresentations. Mehra appealed to the circuit court, but later withdrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5099 - 2005-03-31
that Mehra did not rely on any misrepresentations. Mehra appealed to the circuit court, but later withdrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5099 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Thaddeus J. Derynda
him with the opportunity to seek the statutory remedy. Derynda simply did not take advantage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4638 - 2005-03-31
him with the opportunity to seek the statutory remedy. Derynda simply did not take advantage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4638 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
home, though, because “[Mary] was upset,” but S.M.S. did not know why. After Mary left, S.M.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
home, though, because “[Mary] was upset,” but S.M.S. did not know why. After Mary left, S.M.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
to the officer as gray or green. ¶4 In responding to the call, the officer did not look at the computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
to the officer as gray or green. ¶4 In responding to the call, the officer did not look at the computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
, Smith did not close the gap between himself and Raymond’s vehicle. Smith estimated Raymond’s speed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
, Smith did not close the gap between himself and Raymond’s vehicle. Smith estimated Raymond’s speed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Wright’s counsel did file a motion to suppress these statements on his behalf, but the motion was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986032 - 2025-07-22
, Wright’s counsel did file a motion to suppress these statements on his behalf, but the motion was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986032 - 2025-07-22
State v. John A. Aschenbrener
on this issue; (2) the State did not show that an expert’s opinion was independent of suppressed statements; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
on this issue; (2) the State did not show that an expert’s opinion was independent of suppressed statements; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a canine sniff, that the dog’s alert did not give rise to probable cause to search Thomas’s vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
a canine sniff, that the dog’s alert did not give rise to probable cause to search Thomas’s vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
ex-girlfriend’s house. He further testified that he did not know why he even went to the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19
ex-girlfriend’s house. He further testified that he did not know why he even went to the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19