Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42771 - 42780 of 84336 for case number.
Search results 42771 - 42780 of 84336 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
State v. Jay B. Stephany
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
State v. Travis Blanks
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania v. Michael Gisvold
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1663 For Complete Title †Petition to review Filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10943 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1663 For Complete Title †Petition to review Filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10943 - 2017-09-19
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a permanency plan, and in June 2020, it filed another such plan in each of the cases. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745047 - 2023-12-27
filed a permanency plan, and in June 2020, it filed another such plan in each of the cases. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745047 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
State v. James E. Goodman
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Fuerst, 181 Wis. 2d 903, 915, 512 N.W.2d 243 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 In this case, the court warned Sims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
. Fuerst, 181 Wis. 2d 903, 915, 512 N.W.2d 243 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 In this case, the court warned Sims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case from running consecutive to an earlier sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case from running consecutive to an earlier sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12