Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42771 - 42780 of 83915 for case number.
Search results 42771 - 42780 of 83915 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone got hurt, whatever.” On cross-examination, Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone got hurt, whatever.” On cross-examination, Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
Frontsheet
2015 WI 57 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP175-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
2015 WI 57 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP175-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but respectful to the officers” and that he was recording to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21
but respectful to the officers” and that he was recording to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Carthage
the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case to the trial court for entry of the proper judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case to the trial court for entry of the proper judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
Iggens, was appointed to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
Iggens, was appointed to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Farr’s motion and the case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 After the jury found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
Farr’s motion and the case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 After the jury found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
State v. Charles E. Carthage
in exceptional cases. See Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651, 655, 245 N.W.2d 654 (1976). Generally speaking, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6431 - 2005-03-31
in exceptional cases. See Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651, 655, 245 N.W.2d 654 (1976). Generally speaking, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6431 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in every single felony case using such reasoning.” Id. at 395–396. To properly exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
in every single felony case using such reasoning.” Id. at 395–396. To properly exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Accordingly, we refer to the accomplice by the same name. No. 2018AP2403-CR 3 that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249558 - 2019-11-05
.” Accordingly, we refer to the accomplice by the same name. No. 2018AP2403-CR 3 that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249558 - 2019-11-05
[PDF]
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
in this case; thus, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2744 - 2017-09-19
in this case; thus, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2744 - 2017-09-19