Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42781 - 42790 of 69114 for he.
Search results 42781 - 42790 of 69114 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The prosecutor explained that the victim did not want Rivera incarcerated, and “[t]he State has not agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
.” The prosecutor explained that the victim did not want Rivera incarcerated, and “[t]he State has not agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Heinrich
of postconviction motions; the last one was successful and the genesis of this appeal. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
of postconviction motions; the last one was successful and the genesis of this appeal. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Waunakee v. Donald Maier
for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He argues that the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11463 - 2017-09-19
for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He argues that the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11463 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses at the suppression hearing. Deputy David Oginski testified that he was on patrol the evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980460 - 2025-07-08
witnesses at the suppression hearing. Deputy David Oginski testified that he was on patrol the evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980460 - 2025-07-08
State v. John Konaha
claims that because he demonstrated reason to doubt his postconviction competency, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31
claims that because he demonstrated reason to doubt his postconviction competency, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because he was provided with the date, time, and location to appear to contest the citation, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
because he was provided with the date, time, and location to appear to contest the citation, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
State v. Charles Johnson
the probation extension. Incident to the last consideration, Johnson also claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23
the probation extension. Incident to the last consideration, Johnson also claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
Czarnecki's home. Czarnecki attempted to phone Gerard to tell her this would not be possible because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
Czarnecki's home. Czarnecki attempted to phone Gerard to tell her this would not be possible because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Maravilla was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742047 - 2023-12-19
. Maravilla was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742047 - 2023-12-19
Ronald Waites v. Marianne Cooke
was ineffective because he did not object to the removal of this venireperson. See id. at 392, 462 N.W.2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10516 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective because he did not object to the removal of this venireperson. See id. at 392, 462 N.W.2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10516 - 2005-03-31