Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4281 - 4290 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 4281 - 4290 of 12913 for prosecuting.
State v. Carl Mitchell
in exchange for the prosecution's agreement to request a presentence investigation and to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
in exchange for the prosecution's agreement to request a presentence investigation and to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to a plea agreement in which the prosecution agreed to recommend that the sentence be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
to a plea agreement in which the prosecution agreed to recommend that the sentence be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or defect (NGI) plea, he entered a no-contest plea to the charge. The prosecution recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113991 - 2017-09-21
or defect (NGI) plea, he entered a no-contest plea to the charge. The prosecution recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proceedings arising from this matter, there was also no attempt to address whether the failure to prosecute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
proceedings arising from this matter, there was also no attempt to address whether the failure to prosecute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Devaldis A. Garth
denied his motion to suppress the evidence used to prosecute him. We affirm. No. 00-2496-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3028 - 2017-09-19
denied his motion to suppress the evidence used to prosecute him. We affirm. No. 00-2496-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3028 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the prosecution file for his case. The District Attorney denied the request, citing to State ex rel. Richards v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31930 - 2014-09-15
of the prosecution file for his case. The District Attorney denied the request, citing to State ex rel. Richards v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31930 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
even if the defendant is not prosecuted for his actions. See State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ΒΆ45, 253
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
even if the defendant is not prosecuted for his actions. See State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ΒΆ45, 253
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
State v. James A. Engel
arrest and this prosecution. At the suppression hearing, the officer conceded that when he stopped Engel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26590 - 2006-09-27
arrest and this prosecution. At the suppression hearing, the officer conceded that when he stopped Engel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26590 - 2006-09-27
State v. Jeffrey Levasseur
faith. There is no evidence that the prosecution had bad-faith motives for offering inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14038 - 2005-03-31
faith. There is no evidence that the prosecution had bad-faith motives for offering inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rowlland R. Jackson
the state's brief contains reference to a hearing. No. 95-0876 -3- both the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8840 - 2017-09-19
the state's brief contains reference to a hearing. No. 95-0876 -3- both the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8840 - 2017-09-19