Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42811 - 42820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 42811 - 42820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Richmond Ato Yarney v. State
that found by the trial court. With respect to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12482 - 2017-09-21
that found by the trial court. With respect to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12482 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Pronold
. § 946.12(5) (1997-98). He challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14935 - 2017-09-21
. § 946.12(5) (1997-98). He challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas D. Baehr
a notice of hearing scheduling the small claims case for a court trial on No. 01-1959-D 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16529 - 2017-09-21
a notice of hearing scheduling the small claims case for a court trial on No. 01-1959-D 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16529 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] and sought certiorari review of the decision pursuant to § 62.50(20).[3] The trial court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-09-04
] and sought certiorari review of the decision pursuant to § 62.50(20).[3] The trial court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. Donald now appeals. He argues that he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203600 - 2017-11-28
the motion. Donald now appeals. He argues that he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203600 - 2017-11-28
Lynn L. Baldwin v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.
accepted in lieu of a new trial. Aurora appeals. ¶4 Aurora argues that there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2494 - 2014-06-05
accepted in lieu of a new trial. Aurora appeals. ¶4 Aurora argues that there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2494 - 2014-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304257 - 2020-11-18
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304257 - 2020-11-18
George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
and Door County Environmental Council, Inc. (“Reynolds”) appeal from an order of the trial court affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9466 - 2005-03-31
and Door County Environmental Council, Inc. (“Reynolds”) appeal from an order of the trial court affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9466 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cases where questions of primary jurisdiction occur, both the trial court and the administrative agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32401 - 2008-04-09
cases where questions of primary jurisdiction occur, both the trial court and the administrative agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32401 - 2008-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
following the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. Markov argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103323 - 2013-10-23
following the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. Markov argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103323 - 2013-10-23