Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42821 - 42830 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Wade C. Deveney
. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50, 54 (1996). The manifest injustice test is met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13081 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eduardo Alicea
of the case on an improper basis.”). The test is thus not whether the evidence is “prejudicial” but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
contributory negligence ($5979.34 x 50% = $2989.67). However, under the perverse verdict test, Staehler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19

State v. Roger H. Leiskau
or she acted in conformity with that character. If the evidence satisfies that test, then the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
had Maria R. write out a statement and took pictures of her, but after she passed a breathalyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45899 - 2015-07-28

State v. Shawn D. Pierce
-part test: (1) whether the charges are identical in law and fact, and (2) whether the legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18698 - 2005-06-27

State v. Willie D. Engram
that the trial court “went beyond testing for bias when [it] elicited from the potential jurors responses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19892 - 2005-10-12

State v. Andrew James Garner
opportunity to test that information, the need for a suppression hearing may be rendered moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must satisfy a two-prong test to show both that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06

Nancy Montalvo v. Terre Borkovec, M.D.
a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted tests the legal sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4199 - 2005-03-31