Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42831 - 42840 of 84302 for case number.
Search results 42831 - 42840 of 84302 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, this case was joined with the original sexual assault case. ¶4 After a trial, the jury found Hein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2008-04-14
, this case was joined with the original sexual assault case. ¶4 After a trial, the jury found Hein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2015-07-27
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2015-07-27
CA Blank Order
circuit court cases: operating without a valid license, third offense within three years; two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100748 - 2013-08-12
circuit court cases: operating without a valid license, third offense within three years; two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100748 - 2013-08-12
CA Blank Order
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4655 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-138. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31
of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-138. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31