Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42831 - 42840 of 59340 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP2388-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF681
at the suppression hearing; we take this to be a claim of waiver.4 He also argues that, even if the officer has
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29909 - 2014-09-15

WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP812 Complete Title o...
not previously addressed a claim that an attorney-approval clause rendered a contract illusory, and so both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the expiration of the prior recommitment judgment, which he claims was June 4, 2013. ¶5 In Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115428 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Powell, now pro se, sought another sentence modification based on a claimed new factor. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12

[PDF] Ripple Management v. Diana Goodavage
filed a small claims complaint against Goodavage and her son, Joseph Stearns, on May 22, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4474 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Darrell J. Shearer
. § 343.305. He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
homicide and kidnapping, as No. 2020AP22-CR 2 a party to the crimes.1 Her sole claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06

COURT OF APPEALS
if it is not one with which we ourselves agree.” Id. ¶10 Presby bases his claim of an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21

Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
court granted the defendants' motion, dismissing the Residents' federal law claims on their merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8076 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. First, his claim that judicial review in this matter is governed by WIS. STAT. § 227.48, is defeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813719 - 2024-06-18