Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42871 - 42880 of 94107 for the law on sleep and all cases.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, in that the charges in the new cases at issue were brought before him between three and three and one-half years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631072 - 2023-03-09

[PDF] NOTICE
was not decided on direct appeal, the “new law” that Linden seeks to apply does not retroactively apply to cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34398 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
on direct appeal, the “new law” that Linden seeks to apply does not retroactively apply to cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34398 - 2008-10-27

Henry J. Gefke v. Ruthannes River Centre Cleaner
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied the motion to open the case. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2598 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse Franklin
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17490 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17518 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17517 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. ¶8 In Franklin's case, the court of appeals, in a one-judge decision, affirmed the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2009-02-02