Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. John Yang
was liable for hate crime penalty enhancement. Discussion ¶5 The resolution of this case starts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
was liable for hate crime penalty enhancement. Discussion ¶5 The resolution of this case starts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
not reveal anything in Boettcher’s case notes that supported her opinions, although she did note that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28323 - 2007-03-05
not reveal anything in Boettcher’s case notes that supported her opinions, although she did note that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28323 - 2007-03-05
State v. Charles E. Melton
26, 2003, while out on bail from the drug case, Melton smashed a car window, reached into the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
26, 2003, while out on bail from the drug case, Melton smashed a car window, reached into the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
on a case-by-case basis, under a totality of the circumstances analysis. Id., ¶20. This analysis includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
on a case-by-case basis, under a totality of the circumstances analysis. Id., ¶20. This analysis includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
State v. Scott E. Frye
agree with the State that the most that can be said of the two cases, from the standpoint of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10831 - 2008-12-09
agree with the State that the most that can be said of the two cases, from the standpoint of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10831 - 2008-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
in June of 2007. ¶7 The court acknowledged that in some cases, valuation dates other than the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84802 - 2012-07-11
in June of 2007. ¶7 The court acknowledged that in some cases, valuation dates other than the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84802 - 2012-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, and no deference.”). Further, we must liberally construe the statute to bring borderline cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
, and no deference.”). Further, we must liberally construe the statute to bring borderline cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
warned Loper that, the serious nature of the case notwithstanding, failure to meet those conditions would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2008-11-09
warned Loper that, the serious nature of the case notwithstanding, failure to meet those conditions would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2008-11-09
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
that “the first case was about [River Hills’s] treatment of Diane Antczak’s mother, whereas the second case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
that “the first case was about [River Hills’s] treatment of Diane Antczak’s mother, whereas the second case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raymond W. Lyght
that the case presented an issue of probable cause, rather than reasonable suspicion, because the officer saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17837 - 2017-09-21
that the case presented an issue of probable cause, rather than reasonable suspicion, because the officer saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17837 - 2017-09-21