Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 69092 for he.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 69092 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an amended answer, in which he alleged various affirmative defenses, including, as pertinent here, that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919313 - 2025-02-27
an amended answer, in which he alleged various affirmative defenses, including, as pertinent here, that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919313 - 2025-02-27
John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
Widera molested the Does that he “had sexually molested numerous children and … was a danger to children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2007-06-26
Widera molested the Does that he “had sexually molested numerous children and … was a danger to children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
] trial he did. And because you’re not ready to go, your case is dismissed. You have a right to appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107550 - 2017-09-21
] trial he did. And because you’re not ready to go, your case is dismissed. You have a right to appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Malacara contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73368 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Malacara contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73368 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kerney Wright
of conviction for battery and kidnapping. See §§ 940.19(1) and 940.31(1)(b), STATS. He raises five issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10450 - 2017-09-20
of conviction for battery and kidnapping. See §§ 940.19(1) and 940.31(1)(b), STATS. He raises five issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10450 - 2017-09-20
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
. We begin by addressing a threshold argument raised by Winkel. He contends that the Wilkes’ appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
. We begin by addressing a threshold argument raised by Winkel. He contends that the Wilkes’ appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide by use of a dangerous weapon, after he entered a guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112453 - 2012-03-27
convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide by use of a dangerous weapon, after he entered a guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112453 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Doxtator did not pursue a direct appeal of his conviction. He subsequently petitioned this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
Doxtator did not pursue a direct appeal of his conviction. He subsequently petitioned this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, 2023 postjudgment hearing at which he did not appear.1 Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
, 2023 postjudgment hearing at which he did not appear.1 Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
State v. Ronald Waites
was ineffective because he did not object to the removal of this venireperson. See id. at 392, 462 N.W.2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective because he did not object to the removal of this venireperson. See id. at 392, 462 N.W.2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31