Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 74762 for judgment for us.
Search results 42881 - 42890 of 74762 for judgment for us.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
motion is well-settled: [I]f a motion to withdraw a guilty plea after judgment and sentence alleges facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27588 - 2006-12-26
motion is well-settled: [I]f a motion to withdraw a guilty plea after judgment and sentence alleges facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27588 - 2006-12-26
CA Blank Order
, and Richards has not persuaded us that there is anything that occurred at either his initial parole hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101976 - 2013-09-11
, and Richards has not persuaded us that there is anything that occurred at either his initial parole hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101976 - 2013-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Victor T. Williams
motion now before us in 2000, and the court denied it without holding an evidentiary hearing. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3421 - 2017-09-19
motion now before us in 2000, and the court denied it without holding an evidentiary hearing. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3421 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirmed the judgment of conviction in Johnson’s direct appeal, see State v. Johnson, No. 1999AP1650-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320726 - 2021-01-12
affirmed the judgment of conviction in Johnson’s direct appeal, see State v. Johnson, No. 1999AP1650-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320726 - 2021-01-12
[PDF]
Kenneth Harris v. Thomas G. Borgen
, oppressive or unreasonable and No. 2005AP467 3 represented its will and not its judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20379 - 2017-09-21
, oppressive or unreasonable and No. 2005AP467 3 represented its will and not its judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20379 - 2017-09-21
Frank C. Kesselring v. Ellen K. Kesselring
that the divorce was not yet final and therefore the $50,000 income imputation was not a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31
that the divorce was not yet final and therefore the $50,000 income imputation was not a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeal. We summarily affirmed the judgment in June 1998. The supreme court denied Ellis’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
appeal. We summarily affirmed the judgment in June 1998. The supreme court denied Ellis’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with the use of force, a Class E felony, reducing his exposure to fifteen years’ imprisonment. See §§ 943.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81735 - 2012-04-30
with the use of force, a Class E felony, reducing his exposure to fifteen years’ imprisonment. See §§ 943.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81735 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not explain, and it is not apparent to us, why a change of venue would be required based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
does not explain, and it is not apparent to us, why a change of venue would be required based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
DSC Letterhead
deciding a motion for class certification, effectively treating it as a motion for summary judgment? 2
/supreme/docs/1124cal.pdf - 2024-12-04
deciding a motion for class certification, effectively treating it as a motion for summary judgment? 2
/supreme/docs/1124cal.pdf - 2024-12-04