Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
) & 961.41(1m)(cm)1r (2011-12).[1] Dawson submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
) & 961.41(1m)(cm)1r (2011-12).[1] Dawson submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arraignment and waiver of the preliminary hearing, Wortman filed a motion to suppress evidence, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
arraignment and waiver of the preliminary hearing, Wortman filed a motion to suppress evidence, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Hanson
the “maximum sentence allowed.” In response, Hanson filed a motion contending that the State’s filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
the “maximum sentence allowed.” In response, Hanson filed a motion contending that the State’s filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert D. Hanson
a motion contending that the State’s filing of the victim impact statement violated its promise to cap its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15001 - 2005-03-31
a motion contending that the State’s filing of the victim impact statement violated its promise to cap its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as party to a crime and with repeater enhancements. The parties also agreed to a joint sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177509 - 2017-09-21
as party to a crime and with repeater enhancements. The parties also agreed to a joint sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177509 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chang N. Ju
that a joint trial would create substantial prejudice through the cumulative effect and otherwise, and each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13262 - 2005-03-31
that a joint trial would create substantial prejudice through the cumulative effect and otherwise, and each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13262 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppression of the evidence. ¶4 The trial court denied Ehret’s suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
to suppression of the evidence. ¶4 The trial court denied Ehret’s suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
assault of a child under age thirteen and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
assault of a child under age thirteen and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15