Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 29817 for des.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 29817 for des.
Talib Amin Akbar v. Michael W. Donart
freedom; he based his damage claim on a de minimus one-day delay in mail delivery. In short, Akbar’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11333 - 2005-03-31
freedom; he based his damage claim on a de minimus one-day delay in mail delivery. In short, Akbar’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11333 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Pender
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles A. Toal
the question involves the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11084 - 2017-09-19
the question involves the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Calumet v. Michael Schroeder
of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Village of Sister Bay v. Hockers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13937 - 2014-09-15
of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Village of Sister Bay v. Hockers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13937 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
CA Blank Order
. Whether the claim is procedurally barred is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110576 - 2014-04-22
. Whether the claim is procedurally barred is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110576 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. (Emphasis added.) Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134276 - 2017-09-21
. (Emphasis added.) Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paul B. Rubenalt v. Dale E. Reeve
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14518 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14518 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis. 2d 388
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis. 2d 388
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
[PDF]
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. Dan A. Buchler
review of the action of the prison disciplinary committee is de novo and is limited to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7955 - 2017-09-19
review of the action of the prison disciplinary committee is de novo and is limited to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7955 - 2017-09-19