Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 4291 - 4300 of 12891 for prosecuting.
State v. Kathy Y. Washington
for the prosecution was Troy Stofflet, then employed by the store to prevent employee and customer theft. He told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18318 - 2005-05-31
for the prosecution was Troy Stofflet, then employed by the store to prevent employee and customer theft. He told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18318 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on February 5, 2007, two witnesses responded to prosecution questions incorporating the date of September 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
on February 5, 2007, two witnesses responded to prosecution questions incorporating the date of September 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16208 - 2017-09-21
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2017
affirmed. On appeal, Sanders argued he was improperly prosecuted on count one (the count on which he
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203687 - 2017-11-24
affirmed. On appeal, Sanders argued he was improperly prosecuted on count one (the count on which he
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203687 - 2017-11-24
[PDF]
State v. John T. Williams
-CR 8 improvident, or malicious prosecution and to discover whether there is a substantial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16872 - 2017-09-21
-CR 8 improvident, or malicious prosecution and to discover whether there is a substantial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John A. Lettice
for determination until the State decided to proceed with a second prosecution. He also contends the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13425 - 2017-09-21
for determination until the State decided to proceed with a second prosecution. He also contends the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecution for the same offense.” Holesome v. State, 40 Wis. 2d 95, 102, 161 N.W.2d 283 (1968). This has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508205 - 2022-04-14
prosecution for the same offense.” Holesome v. State, 40 Wis. 2d 95, 102, 161 N.W.2d 283 (1968). This has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508205 - 2022-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
2010, Suchecki pled guilty in a deal with the prosecution, under which he would “cooperate and testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110053 - 2014-04-08
2010, Suchecki pled guilty in a deal with the prosecution, under which he would “cooperate and testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110053 - 2014-04-08
[PDF]
State v. Charles A. Dunlap
the incident with Dunlap happened. The court sustained the prosecution’s objection. ¶11 The final witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15898 - 2017-09-21
the incident with Dunlap happened. The court sustained the prosecution’s objection. ¶11 The final witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15898 - 2017-09-21